FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT
September 1, 1996, through December 31, 1997
Project Title: DEVELOPMENT OF ACTIVATED CHAR FOR COMBINED
SO2/NOx REMOVAL
ICCI Project Number: 96-1/2.1A-7
Principal Investigator: Anthony A. Lizzio, ISGS
Other Investigators: Sheila Desai, Gwen A. Murphy, Gwen L. Donnals, John M. Lytle, ISGS; Bret H. Howard, John L. Haslbeck, NOXSO
Project Manager: Ronald H. Carty, ICCI
ABSTRACT
The NOXSO Corporation has developed under the DOE Clean Coal Technology Program
a dry, post-combustion flue gas treatment system that uses a regenerable
sorbent in a fluidized bed to remove SO2 and NOx from
coal combustion flue gas. The process is especially attractive for use with
high sulfur coals because it generates a saleable sulfur by-product, and
creates no new waste streams. The actual cost of the sorbent presently used
in the NOXSO process, alumina beads impregnated with 2.5% sodium, is greater
than the projected cost of an activated char recently developed by the ISGS
for cleanup of incinerator flue gas. Thus, an opportunity exists to incorporate
ISGS activated char into the NOXSO flue gas treatment process.
The goal of this project, a cooperative effort between the ISGS and NOXSO,
was to develop a low cost activated char from Illinois coal that can be used
to effectively remove SO2 and NOx from coal combustion
flue gas. Activated chars were prepared from IBC-102 coal in both granular
and powdered form. In single (SO2 or NOx) component
tests, the SO2 capacity of one IBC-102 char was greater than that
of a commercial activated carbon (Centaur carbon). NOx removal
with this char was one order of magnitude greater than with Centaur carbon.
Single and multicomponent (SO2/NOx) removal tests performed
by NOXSO showed that this char worked better than the NOXSO sorbent in single
component tests, whereas the NOXSO sorbent removed more NOx in
multicomponent tests. Additional experiments were performed on IBC-102 char
to examine the competitive effects of H2O and SO2 on
low temperature NOx removal (120oC). The SO2
capacity of the char was not affected by NO in the flue gas, however, both
H2O and SO2 appeared to inhibit NO adsorption. Several
new types of chars were prepared to overcome the inhibitory effects of
H2O and SO2. One char removed 90% of the NOx
for 6 h and 95% of the SO2 for 14 h at a space velocity of 3000
h-1. There is no commercial activated carbon on the market today
that can remove both SO2 and NOx from coal combuustion
flue gas. Further modification of the char preparation procedure eliminated
two of the five production steps in order to lower production costs. These
two chars were then tested by NOXSO and their performance compared to that
of the NOXSO sorbent. The SO2 capacity of the lower cost char
was four times greater than that of the NOXSO sorbent. The NOx
removal capability of this char was comparable to that of the NOXSO sorbent
in the first adsorption cycle, however, the char retained only 20% of its
NO capacity in subsequent cycles. Further work is needed to optimize the
char regeneration conditions and to incorporate this char into the NOXSO
process.
Pages 11 through 36 contain proprietary information.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Worldwide interest in carbon-based flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology
is growing and these processes have been proven successful at removing up
to 95% of the SO2 and over 80% of the NOx from combustion
flue gas. An activated carbon FGD process, typically placed after the
precipitator and just before the stack, can be used alone or in conjunction
with other methods of FGD to remove SO2/NOx from flue
gas. This technology has been used in Europe and Japan for cleanup of flue
gas from both coal combustion and waste incineration. Presently, no U.S.
utility employs a carbon-based process to clean flue gas. Carbon based FGD
systems can be integrated into both new and existing power plants. The retrofit
of an existing utility boiler with such a FGD process could, in addition
to improving SO2/NOx emissions, lower overall capital
and operating costs compared to competitive FGD processes. One of the unique
advantages of an activated carbon FGD process is that it removes nearly every
impurity found in combustion flue gas including particulates,
SO2/NOx, mercury, dioxins, furans, and other air toxics.
No other existing FGD process has that capability. There are a number of
research groups presently involved in the development of novel carbon based
processes and materials for flue gas cleanup. The type of carbon used, more
often than not, dictates the economic viability of a given process. A high
quality carbon adsorbent for SO2/NOx removal should
have a high adsorption capacity for SO2 and NOx, rapid
SO2/NOx adsorption kinetics, low reactivity with oxygen,
minimal loss of activity after regeneration, high mechanical strength, and
low cost.
In September 1993, the ISGS initiated Phase I of an ICCI research program (Production and Use of Activated Char for Combined SO2/NOx Removal, Lizzio et al., 1994; 1995) to investigate the possibility of using activated char derived from Illinois coal to clean combustion flue gas. Activated chars were produced from IBC-102 coal under a wide range of pyrolysis and activation conditions and their SO2 adsorption capacities were measured. A novel char preparation method was developed to prepare chars with SO2 capacities significantly greater than those of commercial activated carbons. The work performed in Phase I attracted significant commercial interest, in particular, that of STEAG Aktiengesellschaft, a German firm seeking to market its technology in the U.S. for cleaning flue gas from incinerators. STEAG has pioneered flue gas cleanup in Europe using a low surface area (270 m2/g) activated carbon made from German brown coal. They are presently seeking out suppliers to provide them with a low cost (< $300/ton) activated char for their U.S. market. STEAG estimates a market potential of 80,000 tons/year of activated char (160,000 tons of coal) within five years, assuming 10% of U.S. incinerators adopt their technology, to meet needs emanating from anticipated regulation of emissions from existing incinerators. The ISGS agreed to provide 500 pounds of activated char to STEAG for tests in a demonstration unit to clean flue gas from a U.S. waste incinerator.
As part of Phase I activities, laboratory conditions were identified to produce
a suitable low cost (< $350/ton) adsorbent from an Illinois Colchester
No. 2 coal. With the assistance of Allis Mineral Systems (Milwaukee, WI),
the production steps were carried through two levels of scale up, culminating
in the production of 550 pounds of activated char in an 18 in. ID rotary
tube kiln. A three step process, which included preoxidation, pyrolysis and
activation, was used to produce an activated char with an SO2
adsorption capacity almost twice that of the char presently used by STEAG.
The adsorbent was shipped to Germany and tested on a slip stream of flue
gas from a commercial incinerator. Results indicated that the char was effective
in removing more than 99.7% of the SO2, mercury, dioxins and furans
from the incinerator flue gas.
The pilot scale production of low cost activated char by the ISGS attracted
the attention of several organizations interested in utilizing inexpensive
carbon to clean flue gas. One such company is the NOXSO Corporation, which
has developed under the U.S. DOE Clean Coal Technology Program, a high
efficiency, dry, post-combustion flue gas treatment system that uses a
regenerable sorbent to simultaneously remove SO2 and
NOx from coal combustion flue gas. The process has no impact on
boiler performance, is compact, easy to retrofit, generates a saleable by-product
(sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur, or liquid SO2), and creates
no new waste streams, a distinct advantage over conventional FGD processes.
The cost of the sorbent presently used in the NOXSO process, alumina substrate
impregnated with 2.5% sodium, is $2,000/ton as compared to a projected $350/ton
for ISGS activated char. The NOXSO process during normal operation for a
500 MW power plant typically consumes 2,000 tons of sorbent per year; thus,
there could be a significant savings in operating costs if low cost activated
char is utilized. The integration of additional
SO2/NOx control into the NOXSO process via low cost
activated char, creates a more cost effective and comprehensive pollution
control system. The concept encourages the economical and environmentally
acceptable use of Illinois coal in two ways: first, as feedstock in the
production of the activated char, and second, by improving the NOXSO process.
The goal of the Phase II program, a joint effort between the ISGS and NOXSO,
was to develop an activated char from Illinois coal that can be used in the
NOXSO process, either alone or in conjunction with NOXSO sorbent, to effectively
remove SO2 and NOx and other air toxics from coal
combustion flue gas. The project consisted of seven tasks. In Task 1, activated
chars were prepared from lllinois coal (IBC-102) by a variety of methods
in both granular and powdered form. The physical/chemical properties of the
char were optimized to enhance its SO2/NOx removal
capabilities. In Task 2, the combined SO2/NOx removal
capabilities of the prepared chars were evaluated by the ISGS. In Task 3,
selected chars were further tested by NOXSO in a fixed-bed adsorber for
SO2/NOx removal and regenerability. In Task 4, the
physical/chemical properties of selected chars were determined by the ISGS
and NOXSO. In Task 5, gram quantities of an optimized char underwent combined
SO2/NOx removal tests in a fluidized-bed reactor; its
performance was compared to that of the NOXSO sorbent. In Task 6, if a suitable
activated char was identified, process flowsheets for the production and
use of the char would be developed. In Task 7, technical and management reports
were prepared and submitted to the ICCI.
In the first year (1995-1996) of the Phase II program, a California pellet
mill was used to produce 20 pounds of 6 mm diameter cylindrical IBC-102 coal
pellets. The pelletized steam activated char had excellent mechanical strength
and an SO2 adsorption capacity (120oC) comparable to
that of the NOXSO sorbent. To enhance both SO2 and NOx
removal capabilities, the pelletized steam activated char was subjected to
a liquid phase oxidation/thermal desorption treatment. The SO2
adsorption capacity of this char surpassed that of its granular counterpart
and the catalytic carbon (Centaur carbon) recently developed by the Calgon
Carbon Corporation. The NOx removal capacity (120oC)
of the oxidized/thermally desorbed char was nearly twenty times greater than
that of the Centaur carbon. NOXSO performed single and multicomponent
SO2/NOx removal tests on several ISGS activated chars.
A simulated flue gas containing either or both SO2 (1,200 ppm)
and NO (400 ppm) was used. The oxidized/thermally desorbed char adsorbed
more SO2 and NOx than the NOXSO sorbent in single component
tests, whereas the NOXSO sorbent adsorbed more NOx in combined
SO2/NOx removal tests. The challenge became to design
a carbon that could remove simultaneously both SO2 and
NOx from coal combustion flue gas.
This year, additional experiments were performed on IBC-102 char to examine
the competitive effects of H2O and SO2 on low temperature
NOx removal (120oC). The SO2 capacity of
the char was not affected by NO in the flue gas, however, both H2O
and SO2 appeared to inhibit NO adsorption. Several new chars were
prepared to overcome the inhibitory effects of H2O and
SO2 on NOx removal. One char removed 90% of the
NOx for 6 h and 95% of the SO2 for 14 h at a space
velocity of 3000 h-1. There is no commercial activated carbon
on the market today that can remove both SO2 and NOx
from coal combustion flue gas. Through further modification of this novel
char preparation method, it was possible to eliminate two of the five production
steps without hindering performance. Both new chars were tested by NOXSO
and their performance compared to that of the NOXSO sorbent. The
SO2 capacity of the lower cost char was four times greater than
that of the NOXSO sorbent and was completely regenerable. The NOx
removal capability of this char was comparable to that of the NOXSO sorbent
in the first adsorption cycle, however, the char retained only 20% of its
NO capacity in subsequent cycles. Further work would be needed to optimize
the char regeneration process conditions. The fluidization properties and
crush strength of the char need also be determined. The potential of activated
char in carbon injection-like processes such as the one being developed by
NOXSO and FLS milj a/s in Copenhagen, Denmark should also be investigated.
NOXSO has the capability to perform large scale tests with activated char
in both a 10 in. ID fluidized-bed adsorber and in a gas suspension adsorber,
which simulates a carbon injection process with baghouse and recycle. For
these tests, hundred pound quantities of activated char would be needed.
The remainder of this report contains proprietary information and is not available for distribution except to the sponsor(s) of this project.