FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT
September 1, 1996, through April 30, 1998
Project Title: FIELD STUDIES OF ILLINOIS PCC BOTTOM ASH FOR STRUCTURAL
GRADE CONCRETE PAVEMENTS
ICCI Project Number: 96-1/3.1A-26
Principal Investigator: Nader Ghafoori, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Project Manager: Daniel Banerjee, ICCI
ABSTRACT
In the past four years, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIUC),
under the sponsorship of Materials Technology Center, has performed a series
of laboratory research into engineering properties and long-term durability
of vibratory-placed and roller compacted structural grade concretes containing
bituminous pulverized coal combustion (PCC) bottom ash. These laboratory
efforts have resulted in identification of a number of potentially viable
commercial applications for PCC bottom ash by-product residues.
One potential and promising application of the Illinois PCC solid waste residues, which also accounts for the large utilization of coal-based by-product materials, is in pavement construction. The proposal presented herein is intended to embark on a new endeavor in order to bring the commercialization aspect of the initial laboratory project a step closer to reality by conducting a field demonstration of the optimized mixtures identified during the four-year laboratory investigation. Eight different pavement slabs (each 24 ft wide by 24 ft long) were constructed at an identified site located in the Illinois Coal Development Park, Carterville, by two construction contractors who were part of the industrial participants of the initial projects. All sections were subjected to an extensive engineering evaluation and monitored for approximately two years for short, medium, and long-term performance. The field results were compared to that of the equivalent laboratory-prepared mixes in order to ascertain the suitability of the proposed PCC bottom ash concretes for field paving applications. Field cores taken from paving slabs were also tested for leaching of solid waste to obtain an aqueous solution which are used to determine the materials that could leach into groundwater under the specific testing conditions. The results were then compared with the requirements of Class I and II of IEPA Groundwater Quality Standards.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Most modern pulverized-coal boilers have dry bottom furnaces; that is, the
ash is intended to be removed as a dry solid before complete melting occurs.
The PCC units operating within the state of Illinois are all dry boilers.
These furnaces generally have open grates at their bases. Below the open
grates there is generally a water-filled ash pit designed to receive the
ash from the furnace. Although a small amount of molten slag will form on
the internal walls of the boiler and find its way into the ash pit, a large
portion of the dry bottom ash is collected in a dry state. By collecting
the ash in a dry state, the physical properties of dry bottom ash are quite
different from wet bottom slag. The dry bottom ash has the appearance of
natural sand and, when examined under magnification, the spherical nature
of these particles appear to be internally porous rather than externally
porous. In addition, the predominant material is light in color and has a
sand paper-like surface texture. The dry bottom ash is also lighter in weight
than the slag bottom ash and, thus, generates a lighter product.
The objective of this program is to examine the performance of Illinois PCC
bottom ash structural grade concrete pavements by conducting a demonstration
project at a designated site in Carterville, Illinois. The major tasks assigned
to this field study fully examine the engineering characteristics, long-term
performance, and environmental issues involved in large-scale utilization
of Illinois PCC bottom ash surface course highway pavements.
An experimental two-lane road, consisting of eight different vibratory-placed
concrete slab sections, was constructed. Each 24 x 24 ft slab was 8 inches
deep. In addition to longitudinal joints, shrinkage/construction joints were
provided at 24 ft intervals. Dowels were used to transfer loads between slabs.
A portion of the experimental road consisted of six solid slab sections.
Three of them were made with 100% PCC bottom ash as a fine aggregate component
of concrete. The remaining three solid sections were the control concretes
made with 100% natural siliceous fine aggregate. There were two sandwich
sections made with 4 in. deep of a richer concrete encased between 2 in.
leaner mixtures. Cement factors of 550, 650, and 750 lb/yd3 were
used. Concreted were prepared with a uniform consistency of 4 1/4 inches
and an air-entrainment of 6 1%. All trial mixtures possessed an identical
volume of solid particles and were prepared with a constant slump, water-cement
ratio, and air content. However, to achieve these uniform characteristics,
the amount of added water-reducing and air-entraining admixtures had to vary
among mixes. The dry components and proportion of each field and laboratory
mixture are shown in Tables 1 and 13, respectively, along with the actual
water-cement ratio and the amount of admixtures utilized. Once consolidation
and final finishing were completed, slab sections were sprayed with curing
compound and covered with a plastic sheet for a period of 7 to 10 days prior
to opening to vehicular traffic flow.
Short-Term Properties of Field Paving Slabs - Table 2 documents
the fresh properties of paving slabs. For a practically similar water-to-cement
ratio and workability, the amount of bleeding water for the PCC bottom ash
concrete was nearly 90% lower than that of the control mix. This is explained
through the finer PCC bottom ash particles which attached themselves to the
cement particles, reducing the channels for bleeding and leaving very little
free water available in fresh concrete for bleeding. Table 2 also reveals
that inclusion of PCC bottom ash improved initial and final setting times
when compared to that of the control concretes. When the fine aggregate portion
contained 100% bottom ash, the initial and final setting times of the field
mixtures decreased, over those of equivalent control mixes, by 17 and 20%
respectively. Increases in cement factor reduced the initial and final setting
times of both PCC bottom ash and natural fine aggregate concretes in an
approximately linear fusion. The peak adiabatic temperature rise and the
corresponding elapsed time for both PCC bottom ash and reference field mixes
are shown in Table 2. Test results indicate that all mixtures under consideration
produced peak temperature at a rate similar to each other. The number of
hours elapsed to reach the maximum temperature was also similar for PCC bottom
ash concretes and reference mixtures. And finally, Table 2 displays the measured
air content of the field freshly-mixed concretes which remained within the
intended range of 6 1%.
Medium-Term Properties of Field Paving Slabs - As shown
in Table 3, the unit weight of the PCC bottom ash concrete were slightly
below that of the reference paving slabs. However, they remained in the range
typically seen for normal weight concrete. Table 3 also documents wet (soaked)
and air-dry compressive strengths of both PCC bottom ash and natural fine
aggregate (control) concretes. The PCC bottom concretes gained 75.6% of its
28-day compressive strength in the first seven days after casting, and the
28-day compressive strength was exceeded by an average of 19 to 28% for the
pavement ages of 91 and 180 days, respectively. The strength development
of the control slabs followed a similar pattern, averaging 80% of the 28-day
compressive strength by the first week. At the end of 91 and 180 days, additional
gains of 21 and 31% were recorded over that observed after 28 days of pavement
age. Under air-dry conditions, the compressive strength of the PCC bottom
ash and natural sand concretes was nearly 11% higher than that obtained under
soaked conditions. When compared against the control field slab specimens,
the PCC bottom ash concrete exhibited a 9.2%, 10.41%, and 16.93% strength
gain for the mixtures containing cement content of 550, 650, and 750
lb/yd3, respectively.
The splitting-tensile strengths of the PCC bottom ash and natural sand paving
slabs are illustrated in Table 4 for both wet and air-dry conditions. The
splitting-tensile strength improvements, over that of the reference concrete,
were approximately 2.5%, 15.7%, 14.8%, 9.5% at pavement ages of 7, 28, 91,
and 180 days, respectively. The splitting-tensile resistance under air-dry
conditions was 9.5% and 12.6% higher than those tested in wet conditions
for the PCC bottom ash and natural sand concretes, respectively. The splitting
tensile-compressive strength ratios were in the range of 0.101 - 0.121 for
the PCC bottom ash slabs, reproducing the results obtained for the control
concretes (0.993 - 0.128).
The progression of flexural strength with respect to cement content and curing
age is shown in Table 5. The flexural strength ratio of the PCC bottom ash
to natural sand concretes was 1.08, 1.09, and 1.22 for the mixtures containing
550, 650, and 750 lb/yd3 portland cement, respectively. The 91-day
flexural strength exceeded the 28-day result by nearly 11 and 11.2% for the
PCC bottom ash and reference mixes.
Table 6 documents the shrinkage strain of the test mixtures containing 550,
650, 750 lb/yd3 portland cement. The drying shrinkage of the paving
slabs increased with time and stabilized after roughly 180 days from the
time of initial casting. PCC bottom ash slabs displayed higher ultimate drying
shrinkage strains (30.8, 17.6, and 17.7% at cement factors of 550, 650, 750
lb/yd3, respectively) than the equivalent paving sections made
with control concretes.
Long-Term Properties of Field Paving Slabs - The results
of accelerated chloride permeability tests are shown in Table 7. The control
mixtures allowed, on average, 970% higher current flow than the PCC bottom
ash concretes. All reference slabs are considered moderately permeable, whereas
the PCC bottom ash paving sections can be classified as having very low
permeability to chloride.
The resistance to abrasion of the PCC bottom ash and natural sand concretes
(for the saw-cut surface of the cross section) is shown in Table 8 for the
mixtures containing 550 through 750 lb/yd3 portland cement. The
abrasion resistance (via depth of wear) of the control mixtures improved
by 9.7 and 23.8% when cement content increased from 550 to 650 to 750
lb/yd3, respectively. The PCC bottom ash concretes also exhibited
a similar trend, and resistance to abrasion improved by 12.2 and 23.4% when
the same cement contents were utilized. The average depth of wear for the
bottom ash mixes was nearly 18% higher than that of the natural sand (control)
concretes.
The absorption, an indirect measure of moisture conductivity, of both PCC
bottom ash and natural sand slabs is shown in Table 9. The higher amount
of fines in PCC bottom ash, as compared to that of the natural sand, provided
lower absorption for the bottom ash concrete slabs. The 7-day absorptions
of the PCC bottom ash concrete was lower by nearly 30% than that of the
equivalent control mixes.
The resistance to freezing and thawing with deicing salts expressed in mass
loss and surface rating of the field paving slabs is shown in Table 10. Although
the impermeability of the bottom ash concretes surpassed that of the control
mixes, the porous nature of the less-dense PCC bottom ash aggregate and the
higher water-cement ratio resulted in a greater resistance to freezing and
thawing with deicing salts for the natural sand concrete slab sections.
As documented in Table 11, all field specimens completed 300 freezing and
thawing cycles with the lowest durability factor recorded at 95.4%. The PCC
bottom ash concretes exhibited a similar resistance to rapid freezing and
thawing when compared to that of the control field samples. Although the
failure criterion (relative dynamic modulus of elasticity of 60%) was never
reached, a moderate amount of surface scaling was found (after 300 freezing
and thawing cycles) in the bottom ash specimen containing a low cement content
of 550 lb/yd3. The mass loss and surface rating of all test specimens
taken after 50 freezing and thawing cycles, up to 300 cycles, are shown in
Table 11.
Leachate Studies - The results of ASTM shake tests for portland
cement, PCC bottom ash, and field paving slabs are reported in Table 12.
In general, all paving slabs under consideration, complied with the requirements
of Class I and II of IEPA Groundwater. However, elements T1 and Sb recorded
noise levels and they may be closely examined under (1) recalibration of
ASTM shake test or (2) graphite furnace atomic absorption test.
Fresh and Hardened Properties of Laboratory-Made Specimens - the matrix components and proportions, and the resulting water-to-cement ratios are shown in Table 13. The results of the tests conducted for fresh and hardened properties are documented in Tables 14 and 15, respectively, for the PCC bottom ash and natural sand concretes.
| Mixture No. | Cement Content (lb/yd^3) | Natural Fine Aggregate (lb/yd^3) | PCC Bottom (lb/yd^3) | Limestone Coarse Aggregate (lb/yd^3) | Actual Water (lb/yd^3) | Water-Cement Ratio | Water Reducer Admixture (oz/100# of cement | Air Entraining Admixture (oz/100# of cement) | Air Content Designated % |
| 100 | 550 | 0 | 1160 | 1878 | 258 | 0.47 | 10 | 2 | 6+/-1 |
| 200 | 650 | 0 | 1039 | 1878 | 272.35 | 0.419 | 10 | 2 | 6+/-1 |
| 300 | 750 | 0 | 906 | 1878 | 288.8 | 0.385 | 10 | 2 | 6+/-1 |
| 400* | 550 | 1157 | 0 | 1936 | 246.5 | 0.448 | 0 | 1 | 6+/-1 |
| 500* | 650 | 1040 | 0 | 1936 | 243.4 | 0.375 | 0 | 1 | 6+/-1 |
| 600* | 750 | 899 | 0 | 1936 | 280 | 0.373 | 0 | 1 | 6+/-1 |
| S200,T or B S100, M | 650
550 |
0
0 |
1039
1160 |
1878
1878
|
267.42
260.7 |
0.411
0.474 |
10
10 |
2
2 |
6+/-1
6+/-1 |
| S300,T or B S100 M | 750
550 |
0
0 |
906
1160 |
1878
1878 |
286.36
260.7 |
0.381
0.474 |
10
10 |
2
2 |
6+/-1
6+/-1 |
*Control Pavements S = Sandwich sections T, B, & M = top, bottom and middle
| Mixture No. | Slump (in.) | Air Content Measured (%) | Bleeding (%) | Initial Time of Setting (hrs) | Final Time of Setting (hrs) | Peak Adiabatic Temperature (degree F) | Time to Reach Peak Adiabatic (hrs) |
| 100 | 3.8 | 6.25 | 0.01 | 4.02 | 5.27 | 125 | 11 |
| 200 | 4.0 | 5.7 | 0.015 | 3.43 | 4.43 | 131 | 10 |
| 300 | 4.3 | 7 | 0.042 | 3.03 | 3.77 | 140 | 11 |
| 400 | 4.0 | 7 | 0.18 | 4.72 | 5.87 | 120 | 10 |
| 500 | 4.0 | 6.4 | 0.21 | 4.02 | 5.43 | 126 | 12 |
| 600 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 0.22 | 3.77 | 4.93 | 136 | 12 |
| S200, T or B S100, M | 4.0
4.0 |
7
6 |
0.023
0.01 |
3.53
4.39 |
4.64
5.53 |
132
124 |
10
11 |
| S300, T or B S100, M | 4.3
4.0 |
6
5.5 |
0.05
0.01 |
3.22
4.39 |
4.00
5.53 |
143
122 |
11
11 |
| Mixture No. | Unit Weight (lb/yd^3) | Soaked Compressive Strength (psi) | Air-Dry Compressive Strength (psi) | ||||||
| Pavement Age (Days) | Pavement Age (Days) | ||||||||
| 7 | 28 | 91 | 180 | 7 | 28 | 91 | 180 | ||
| 100 | 136.8 | 2779 | 3730 | 4443 | 4783 | 3087 | 4143 | 4944 | 5322 |
| 200 | 140.2 | 3247 | 4291 | 5071 | 5493 | 3517 | 4648 | 5417 | 5868 |
| 300 | 145.4 | 3762 | 4933 | 5920 | 6261 | 4220 | 5534 | 6768 | 7158 |
| 400 | 145 | 2628 | 3389 | 4025 | 4380 | 2949 | 3803 | 4490 | 4886 |
| 500 | 146.2 | 3022 | 3741 | 4556 | 4954 | 3326 | 4118 | 4911 | 5340 |
| 600 | 148.3 | 3336 | 4093 | 5088 | 5413 | 3737 | 4585 | 5705 | 6070 |
| S200, T or B S100,M | 138.6 | 2788 | 4015 | 4785 | 5168 | 3389 | 4496 | 5270 | 5683 |
| S300, T or B S100, M | 141.4 | 3217 | 4468 | 5352 | 5754 | 3712 | 4894 | 5903 | 6287 |
| Mixture No. | Soaked Splitting-Tensile Resistance (psi) | Air-Dry Splitting-Tensile Resistance (psi) | ||||||
| Pavement Age (Days) | Pavement Age (Days) | |||||||
| 7 | 28 | 91 | 180 | 7 | 28 | 91 | 180 | |
| 100 | 341 | 427 | 458 | 489 | 379 | 474 | 506 | 540 |
| 200 | 392 | 492 | 532 | 547 | 424 | 532 | 556 | 572 |
| 300 | 451 | 565 | 614 | 640 | 494 | 620 | 688 | 717 |
| 400 | 343 | 385 | 402 | 446 | 375 | 421 | 468 | 519 |
| 500 | 383 | 424 | 454 | 512 | 421 | 466 | 523 | 554 |
| 600 | 425 | 466 | 500 | 539 | 474 | 520 | 582 | 628 |
| S200, T or B S100, M | 378 | 468 | 493 | 516 | 406 | 516 | 539 | 564 |
| S300, T or B S100, M | 394 | 499 | 561 | 590 | 437 | 548 | 617 | 652 |
| Mixture No. | Pavement Age (days) | |
| 28 | 91 | |
| 100 | 537 | 589 |
| 200 | 585 | 654 |
| 300 | 734 | 816 |
| 400 | 506 | 542 |
| 500 | 535 | 603 |
| 600 | 596 | 678 |
| S200, T or B
S100, M |
561 |
622 |
| S300, T or B
S100, M |
667 |
733 |
| Mixture No. | Shrinkage Strain (%)
Exposure Duration (Days) |
|||||
| 28 | 60 | 90 | 180 | 270 | 360 | |
| 100 | 0.01 | 0.021 | 0.028 | 0.031 | 0.033 | 0.034 |
| 200 | 0.02 | 0.027 | 0.033 | 0.038 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| 300 | 0.024 | 0.038 | 0.41 | 0.045 | 0.048 | 0.048 |
| 400 | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.023 | 0.025 | 0.026 | 0.026 |
| 500 | 0.016 | 0.023 | 0.026 | 0.031 | 0.033 | 0.034 |
| 600 | 0.019 | 0.028 | 0.035 | 0.038 | 0.04 | 0.041 |
| Mixture No. | Charge Passed (Coulombs) | Chloride Permeability |
| 100 | 691 | very low |
| 200 | 288 | very low |
| 300 | 145 | very low |
| 400 | 3679 | moderate |
| 500 | 3001 | moderate |
| 600 | 2361 | moderate |
| Mixture No. | Depth of Wear (x 10^ -4 in.)
Testing Duration (Minutes) |
|||||||
| 0.5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 20 | |
| 100 | 100 | 125 | 200 | 232 | 251 | 276 | 305 | 330 |
| 200 | 75 | 100 | 167 | 193 | 213 | 229 | 256 | 290 |
| 300 | 83 | 96 | 137 | 159 | 178 | 194 | 230 | 253 |
| 400 | 81 | 104 | 135 | 161 | 178 | 206 | 235 | 269 |
| 500 | 57 | 70 | 108 | 136 | 148 | 173 | 206 | 243 |
| 600 | 42 | 55 | 95 | 109 | 121 | 139 | 168 | 205 |
| Mixture No. | Absorption (%)
Exposure Duration (Days) |
|||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| 100 | 1.70 | 1.82 | 1.93 | 2.03 |
| 200 | 1.63 | 1.7 | 1.78 | 1.83 |
| 300 | 1.28 | 1.33 | 1.37 | 1.40 |
| 400 | 2.50 | 2.60 | 2.68 | 2.73 |
| 500 | 2.08 | 2.20 | 2.33 | 2.45 |
| 600 | 1.93 | 2.07 | 2.19 | 2.21 |
| S200, T or B
S100, M |
1.68 |
1.77 |
1.94 |
1.91 |
| S300, T or B
S100, M |
1.30 |
1.41 |
1.45 |
1.58 |
| Mixture No. | Mass Loss (%) and Surface Rating*
Number of Cycles |
|||||||||
| 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | |
| 100 | 0.23 (1) | 0.79 (2) | 1.52 (2) | 2.35 (4) | 3.22 (5) | 4.2 (5) | 4.99 (5) | 5.91 (5) | 6.72 (5) | 7.59 (5) |
| 200 | 0.06 (1) | 0.09 (2) | 0.24 (2) | 0.37 (2) | 0.52 (2) | 0.70 (3) | 0.96 (3) | 1.17 (4) | 1.41 (4) | 1.54 (4) |
| 300 | 0.04 (1) | 0.06 (1) | 0.07 (1) | 0.14 (1) | 0.25 (1) | 0.36 (2) | 0.50 (2) | 0.64 (3) | 0.85 (3) | 0.96 (4) |
| 400 | 0.03 (1) | 0.06 (1) | 0.12 (2) | 0.19 (2) | 0.31 (2) | 0.44 (3) | 0.56 (3) | 0.81 (4) | 1.03 (4) | 1.18 (4) |
| 500 | 0.03 (1) | 0.07 (1) | 0.12 (1) | 0.18 (1) | 0.24 (1) | 0.41 (1) | 0.49 (1) | 0.60 (2) | 0.75 (2) | 0.89 (2) |
| 600 | 0.04 (1) | 0.05 (1) | 0.1 (1) | 0.16 (1) | 0.24 (1) | 0.32 (1) | 0.46 (1) | 0.58 (2) | 0.64 (2) | 0.71 (2) |
| S200, T or B S100, M | 0.14 (1,1)** | 0.55 (2,1) | 1.03 (3,2) | 1.65 (4,2) | 2.23 (5,3) | 2.81 (5,3) | 3.30 (5,4) | 4.02 (5,4) | 4.46 (5,4) | 5.08 (5,5) |
| S300, T or B S100, M | 6.09 (1,1) | 0.44 (2,1) | 0.82 (3,2) | 1.2 (4,2) | 1.67 (4,2) | 1.89 (5,2) | 2.29 (5,3) | 2.77 (5,3) | 3.24 (5,3) | 3.97 (5,4) |
*Surface Rating ( ): 0- No scaling, 1- Very Light Scaling (1/8 in. Depth, Max, no coarse aggregate visible), 2- Slight to Moderate Scaling, 3- Moderate Scaling (some coarse aggregate visible), 4- Moderate to Severe Scaling, and 5- Severe Scaling (coarse aggregate visible over entire surface)
**(Rating of Middle Section, Rating of Outer Section)
| Mixture No. | Durability Factor (%)/Mass Loss (%)/Surface Rating*
Number of Freezing and Thawing Cycles |
|||||
| 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | |
| 100 | 100/0.03/0 | 100/0.07/1 | 98.84/0.14/2 | 98.84/0.17/2 | 97.67/0.30/3 | 96.51/0.41/4 |
| 200 | 100/0.03/0 | 100/0.05/0 | 99.42/0.08/1 | 99.12/0.13/1 | 98.27/0.21/2 | 97.39/0.29/3 |
| 300 | 100/0.02/0 | 100/0.03/0 | 99.68/0.08/1 | 99.28/0.12/1 | 98.63/0.18/2 | 97.71/0.23/2 |
| 400 | 100/0.04/0 | 100/0.06/1 | 98.70/0.13/1 | 98.34/0.18/2 | 96.13/0.26/3 | 95.43/0.31/3 |
| 500 | 100/0.03/0 | 100/0.05/0 | 98.9/0.08/1 | 98.35/0.13/1 | 96.70/0.18/2 | 96.15/0.23/2 |
| 600 | 100/0.0/0 | 100/0.03/0 | 99.45/0.05/1 | 99.01/0.10/1 | 98.81/0.15/1 | 97.92/0.18/2 |
*Surface Rating ( ): 0- No scaling, 1- Very Light Scaling (1/8 in. Depth, Max, no coarse aggregate visible), 2- Slight to Moderate Scaling, 3- Moderate Scaling (some coarse aggregate visible), 4- Moderate to Severe Scaling, and 5- Severe Scaling (coarse aggregate visible over entire surface)
| Element (PPM) | Class 1 Standard | Class 2 Standard | Portland Cement | PCC Bottom Ash | Mixture No. | |||||
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 | |||||
| Ag | 0.05 | - | ND | ND | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 |
| Al | - | - | 0.09 | 1.06 | 0.39 | 0.6 | 1.63 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.1 |
| As | 0.05 | 0.2 | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B | 2 | 2 | 0.017 | 0.36 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Ba | 2 | - | 1.19 | 0.12 | 1.52 | 1.09 | 0.69 | 1.12 | 1.27 | 1.06 |
| Be | 0.004 | 0.5 | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ca | - | TDS=1200 | 960 | 60 | 465 | 348 | 22.2 | 513 | 635 | 690 |
| Cd | 0.005 | 0.05 | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Co | 1 | 1 | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cr | 0.1 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Cu | 0.65 | 0.65 | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| Fe | 5 | 5 | ND | ND | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mg | - | - | ND | ND | 0.2 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Mn | 0.15 | 10 | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mo | - | - | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ni | 0.1 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.05 |
| Pb | 0.0075 | 0.1 | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sb | 0.006 | 0.024 | 0.04* | 0.05* | 0.03* | 0.02* | 0.02* | 0.02* | 0.03* | 0.01* |
| Se | 0.05 | 0.05 | ND | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Tl | 0.002 | 0.02 | 0.03* | 0.02* | 0.01* | 0.02* | 0.01* | 0.02* | 0.02* | 0.02* |
| V | - | - | ND | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zn | 5 | 10 | 0.28 | 0.1 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.6 | 0.21 |
| pH | - | - | NA | NA | 12.08 | 12.12 | 11.82 | 12.23 | 12.31 | 11.57 |
- None, ND = Not Detectable, *Noise Level, and NA = Not Available
| Mixture No. | Cement Content (lb/yd^3) | Natural Fine Aggregate (lb/yd^3) | PCC Bottom Ash (lb/yd^3) | Limestone Coarse Aggregate (lb/yd^3) | Added Water (lb/yd^3) | Water Cement Ratio | Water Reducer Admixture (oz/100# of cement) | Air Entraining Admixture (oz/100# of cement) | Air Content Designated (%) |
| 100 | 550 | 0 | 1160 | 1878 | 247.5 | 0.54 | 9 | 5 | 6 +/- 1 |
| 200 | 650 | 0 | 1039 | 1878 | 260 | 0.4 | 9 | 5 | 6 +/- 1 |
| 300 | 750 | 0 | 906 | 1878 | 281.3 | 0.375 | 8 | 5 | 6 +/- 1 |
| 700* | 550 | 1157 | 0 | 1936 | 118.4 | 0.45 | 0 | 1 | 6 +/- 1 |
| 800* | 650 | 1040 | 0 | 1936 | 110 | 0.4 | 0 | 1 | 6 +/- 1 |
| 900* | 750 | 899 | 0 | 1936 | 110.6 | 0.375 | 0 | 2 | 6 +/- 1 |
*Control Mixtures
| Mixture No. | Slump (in.) | Air Content Measured (%) | Bleeding (%) | Initial Times of Setting (hrs) | Final Times of Setting (hrs) | Peak Adiabatic Temperature (degree F) | Time to Reach Peak Adiabatic Temperature (hrs) | One-Day Demoled Unit Weight (lb/ft^3) |
| 100 | 4+/- 1/4 | 6.5 | 0 | 3.12 | 4.25 | 125 | 11 | 142.3 |
| 200 | 4+/- 1/4 | 5.5 | 0.01 | 2.73 | 3.93 | 131 | 10 | 143.1 |
| 300 | 4+/- 1/4 | 5.5 | 0.047 | 2.55 | 3.77 | 140 | 11 | 143.8 |
| 700 | 4+/- 1/4 | 6 | 0.305 | 3.63 | 4.75 | 120 | 10 | 145.9 |
| 800 | 4+/- 1/4 | 6 | 0.324 | 3.58 | 4.7 | 126 | 12 | 146.5 |
| 900 | 4+/- 1/4 | 6 | 0.352 | 3.23 | 4.68 | 136 | 12 | 147.1 |
| Mixture No. | Compressive Strength (psi) | Splitting Tensile Resistance (psi) | Flexural Strength (psi) | |||||||
| Curing Age (Days) | Curing Age (Days) | Curing Age (Days) | ||||||||
| 7 | 28 | 91 | 180 | 7 | 28 | 91 | 180 | 28 | 91 | |
| 100 | 3635 | 4879 | 5805 | 6249 | 435 | 544 | 600 | 640 | 633 | 694 |
| 200 | 3963 | 5237 | 6069 | 6574 | 485 | 608 | 663 | 682 | 684 | 765 |
| 300 | 4244 | 5565 | 6700 | 7086 | 516 | 647 | 700 | 730 | 724 | 805 |
| 400 | 3342 | 4310 | 4960 | 5398 | 396 | 444 | 493 | 547 | 542 | 581 |
| 500 | 3742 | 4633 | 5406 | 5878 | 442 | 489 | 544 | 613 | 576 | 649 |
| 600 | 4051 | 4970 | 5815 | 6187 | 478 | 524 | 585 | 631 | 604 | 687 |