FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT
September 1, 1995, through August 31, 1996
Project Title: DESULFURIZATION OF COAL: ENHANCED SELECTIVITY USING PHASE TRANSFER CATALYSTS
DOE Cooperative Agreement Number: DE-FC22-92PC92521 (Year 4)
ICCI Project Number: 95-1/1.1D-3P
Principal Investigator: Dr. Stephen R. Palmer, SIUC
Other Investigators: Dr. Edwin J. Hippo, SIUC
Project Manager: Dr. Ken Ho, ICCI
ABSTRACT
Due to environmental problems related to the combustion of high sulfur Illinois
coal, there continues to be interest in the development of viable pre-combustion
desulfurization processes. Recent studies by the authors have obtained very
good sulfur removals but the reagents that are used are too expensive. Use
of cheaper reagents leads to a loss of desired coal properties.
This study investigated the application of phase transfer catalysts to the
selective oxidation of sulfur in coal using air and oxygen as oxidants. The
phase transfer catalyst was expected to function as a selectivity moderator
by permitting the use of milder reaction conditions than otherwise necessary.
This would enhance the sulfur selectivity and help retain the heating value
of the coal.
The use of certain coal combustion wastes for desulfurization, and the
application of cerium (IV) catalyzed air oxidations for selective sulfur
oxidation were also studied. If successful this project would have lead to
the rapid development of a commercially viable desulfurization process. This
would have significantly improved the marketability of Illinois coal. However,
the phase transfer catalysts, the cerium and the scrubber sledge did not
catalize the sulfur removal significantly.
U.S. DOE Patent Clearance is NOT required prior to
the publication of this document.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to environmental problems related to the combustion of high sulfur Illinois
coal, there continues to be interest in the development of commercially viable
pre-combustion desulfurization processes. These processes would allow the
continued use of high sulfur Illinois coal for electricity generation, without
the need for post combustion scrubbers.
Recent studies by the authors use a combination of a selective oxidation
pretreatment reaction with a subsequent base desulfurization reaction to
obtain very good sulfur removals (up to 95%). Unfortunately the cost of the
chemical reagents used in the oxidative pretreatment is too high for commercial
development and the use of cheaper oxidants results in too much carbon oxidation
and hence Btu loss.
Although these studies failed to provide a cost effective desulfurization
process, they do point us towards the types of chemical reactions needed
for successful desulfurization. It is believed that the key to the success
of the two-step process lies in the ability of the oxidant to selectively
oxidize the organic sulfur species to their sulfoxides, sulfones or sulfonic
acids in the pretreatment step. This selectively weakens the C-S bonds and
therefore makes the subsequent removal of sulfur much easier.
The challenge that we face at this time is finding an inexpensive oxidant
system that retains the desired sulfur selectivity and preserves the desired
properties of the coal such as Btu value. Identifying this inexpensive oxidant
system is the primary goal of this study. Specifically the application of
phase transfer catalysts to the selective oxidation of sulfur over that of
carbon, using air and oxygen as oxidants, is being investigated.
Phase transfer catalysts are substances that have the ability to transport
chemical reagents across phase boundaries. This ability promotes chemical
reactions in heterogeneous systems that would not otherwise take place or
which would take place only very slowly. In this sense they are true catalysts
and as such permit the formation of desired products under much milder, and
therefore more selective, reaction conditions. It is these features that
make phase transfer catalysts so attractive for reactions involving coal.
It is anticipated that phase transfer catalysts would act as selectivity
moderators in the oxidation of sulfur in coal.
Although the moderation of oxidative selectivity using phase transfer catalysts is the primary area for research in this project, a number of related features are also being examined. These include the potential use of coal combustion residues for the desulfurization step and the application of cerium (IV) catalyzed air oxidation to the selective oxidation of sulfur in coal.
Specific objectives have been identified for the completion of this project.
These are:
1. Use physically cleaned coals from the Illinois Basin, to prepare a variety
of selectively oxidized coals using air and oxygen under phase transfer catalysis
conditions.
2. Test these selectively oxidized coals for enhanced desulfurization under
standard desulfurization conditions.
3. Compare these desulfurization results with those obtained for oxidized
coals prepared without the phase transfer catalyst.
4. Investigate the applicability of cerium (IV) catalyzed air oxidation for
selective oxidation of sulfur in coal, both with and without phase transfer
catalysts.
5. Examine the ability of alkaline coal combustion wastes (scrubber wastes
and fly ash) to desulfurize selectively oxidized and unoxidized coals.
6. Investigate the kinetics and mechanism of desulfurization under these
various conditions by varying the time and temperature of the treatments
on coals and model compounds.
7. Measure Btu contents after both oxidation and desulfurization reactions
to quantify Btu recoveries after each process.
8. Test selected products for trace element content to determine if these
elements can also be removed by the process.
9. Investigate the influence of the amount of phase transfer catalyst on
the level of selective oxidation and subsequent desulfurization.
10. Examine the recovery of phase transfer catalysts from the reaction media
to see if recycling of the catalyst would be possible.
As far as the authors have been able to determine the application of phase
transfer catalysts to the selective oxidation of sulfur in coal had not been
investigated before. Similarly, the authors could not find reference to the
application of the cerium (IV) catalyzed selective air oxidation of organic
sulfur to the study of coal desulfurization. In addition, the use of coal
combustion wastes for the precombustion desulfurization of coals appears
to be another unique feature of this project.
From the data received, we can see that recovery of the coal oxidation product
is high with yields approaching 95-97% in many cases. Unfortunately, if we
compare the sulfur contents of the oxidation products we see that there is
very little difference between them and the sulfur content of the blank sample
(ie. No oxidant, no catalyst). This indicates that no or very little sulfur
has been removed during the oxidation process.
The sulfur reductions obtained for all of the oxidized samples after base
desulfurization are around 60 to 65%. Thus the use of the phase transfer
catalysts and the cerium catalyst, under the oxidation conditions employed,
does not appear to have significantly impacted the level of desulfurization
obtained. However, it should be noted that the introduction of the cerium
catalyst, by itself and in combination with TBAC, did improve the level of
desulfurization by around 5%.
Attempts to optimize the level of desulfurization by employing other variables such as increased reaction time (1hr to 24hrs), increased catalyst loading (5% to 20%), introduction a catalyst soak time (1hr to 24hrs), changing the solvent to include methanol and THF, increased oxidant flow rates (200ml/min to 600ml/min), and the introduction of ultrasonic reaction conditions, have not been successful at this time.