September 1, 1995, through August 31, 1996
Project Title: STABILIZATION OF SPENT SORBENTS
FROM COAL-BASED POWER GENERATION PROCESSES
DOE Cooperative Agreement Number: DE-FC22-92PC92521(Year 4)
ICCI Project Number: 95-1/3.3A-2M
Principal Investigator: Javad Abbasian, Institute of Gas Technology
Other Investigators: James R. Wangerow, Institute of Gas Technology
Project Manager: Daniel D. Banerjee, ICCI
ABSTRACT
The overall objective of this study was to determine the effect of implementation
of the new and more stringent EPA Protocol Test Method involving sulfide
containing waste, on the suitability of the oxidized spent sorbents from
gasification of high sulfur coals for disposal in landfills, and to determine
the optimum operating conditions in a "final" hydrolysis stage for conversion
of the residual calcium sulfide in these wastes to materials that are suitable
for disposal in landfills. An additional objective was to study the effect
of ash on the regeneration and ash-sorbent separation steps in the Spent
Sorbent Regeneration Process (SSRP).
To achieve these objectives, a large set of oxidized samples of sulfided
calcium-based sorbents (produced in earlier ICCI-funded programs) as well
as oxidized samples of gasifier discharge (containing ash and spent sorbent)
were tested according to the new EPA test protocol. Samples of the oxidized
spent sorbents that did not pass the EPA procedure were reacted with water
and carbon dioxide to convert the residual calcium sulfide to calcium carbonate.
The result of EPA strong acid tests conducted with the oxidized samples of sulfided calcium-based sorbents indicate that when the calcium sulfide content of these solid waste materials is below 4.5%, they will meet the EPA requirement for sulfur release, making them suitable for landfill disposal. When the calcium sulfide content of such solid waste materials are above 4.5%, they can be reacted with water and carbon dioxide to remove the residual sulfide to below 0.5%, making them suitable for landfill disposal. The presence of ash in the LASH (a mixture of limestone-derived and ash-derived) material did not appear to affect the sulfur leachability of such waste materials.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Advanced or second-generation power generation systems such as
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) and two-stage Pressurized
Fluidized-Bed Combustion (PFBC) plants can achieve higher thermal efficiencies
and a lower cost of electricity than a conventional pulverized coal-fired
(PC fired) plant equipped with flue gas desulfurization. Because these advanced
processes can use high sulfur coals in an environmentally acceptable manner,
they have the potential to expand the marketability of Illinois coals. Projected
costs for IGCC and PFBC plants are substantially lower than comparable
pulverized-coal (PC) combustion plants, especially if air emission regulations
were to require much lower SO2 emissions.
These advanced coal conversion processes generally involve gasification of
coal followed by combustion of the fuel gas in a gas turbine. In these processes,
the sulfur compounds present in coal are converted to hydrogen sulfide when
the coal is gasified. To comply with the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) and lessen corrosion of the gas turbine, a high fraction of the sulfur
must be removed from the fuel gas stream.
One approach for removing sulfur compounds from the fuel gas is the use of
calcium-based sorbents, such as dolomite and limestone in the gasifier. In
such processes, dolomite and limestone react with the sulfur compounds (mainly
H2S) to significantly reduce (i.e., more than 90%) the sulfur
content of the fuel gas.
The solid wastes, produced from the reactions of calcium-based sorbents with
hydrogen sulfide in the fuel gas, contain calcium sulfide which is unstable
and has the tendency to decompose when it contacts moisture in the air, releasing
hydrogen sulfide to the atmosphere. To dispose of the solid waste products
in an environmentally acceptable manner, calcium sulfide can be converted
either to stable calcium sulfate through reaction with oxygen, or calcium
carbonate through reaction with water and carbon dioxide.
Stabilization of partially sulfided dolomite with oxygen has been studied
by the principal investigator of this project in earlier ICCI-funded programs.
The results of these studies indicate that limestone can only be partially
sulfated (about 30%) while dolomite can be sulfated above 95%. The extent
of sulfation depends not only on the sorbent type but also on the extent
of sulfidation in the gasifier.
Surprisingly, essentially all the oxidized sorbents (especially those with
high calcium sulfide content) produced in the earlier studies successfully
passed the less stringent EPA test protocol, making them suitable for disposal.
However, because the test procedure was believed to be inadequate, further
studies were limited to dolomite where a high level of conversion of calcium
sulfide could be achieved.
A new protocol for testing sulfide containing waste, which is much more stringent than the old method, has been proposed by EPA.
It was believed that because of stringent disposal requirements, singe-stage
oxidative stabilization process involving limestone or even dolomite, would
prove to be insufficient for production of acceptable material for disposal.
Under such a scenario, a second stage would be necessary to remove the residual
calcium sulfide from the sample. Earlier studies at IGT under sponsorship
of ICCI have shown that over 99% of calcium sulfide in the spent sorbent
can be removed through the reaction of calcium sulfide with water and carbon
dioxide (hydrolysis). Such a process is believed to be suitable for conversion
of the residual calcium sulfide to calcium carbonate.
The overall objective of this study was to determine the effect of implementation
of the new and more stringent EPA Protocol Test Method involving sulfide
containing waste, on the suitability of the oxidized spent sorbents from
gasification of high sulfur coals, and to determine the optimum operating
conditions in a "final" hydrolysis stage for conversion of the residual calcium
sulfide in these wastes to materials that are suitable for disposal in landfills.
An additional objective of this program was to study the effect of ash on
the regeneration and ash-sorbent separation steps in the Spent Sorbent
Regeneration Process (SSRP).
In this study, oxidized samples of the spent sorbents (produced in earlier
ICCI-funded projects) covering a broad range of operating variables, including
sorbent type, particle size, level of sulfidation, and level of sulfation,
were evaluated in terms of their suitability for disposal under the new and
more stringent EPA test procedure. The results of these tests were used to
establish a guideline for selection of the relevant operating conditions
in the one-step oxidative stabilization process.
Samples that did not pass the EPA test procedure were further reacted with
water and carbon dioxide in the "hydrolysis" process to convert the residual
calcium sulfide to calcium carbonate at the optimum operating conditions
for this second stage determined in this project. The hydrolyzed sample were
also tested under the new EPA procedure.
The result of EPA strong acid tests conducted with the oxidized samples of
sulfided calcium-based sorbents indicate that when the calcium sulfide content
of these solid waste materials is below 4.5%, they will meet the EPA requirement
for sulfur release, making them suitable for landfill disposal.
When the calcium sulfide content of such solid waste materials are above
4.5%, they can be reacted with water and carbon dioxide in the temperature
range of 60 to 120C at 5 bar to remove the residual sulfide to below 0.5%,
making them suitable for landfill disposal.
The presence of ash in the LASH (a mixture of limestone-derived and ash-derived)
material did not appear to affect either the sulfur leachability of such
waste materials, or the removal of the residual sulfide through reaction
with water and carbon dioxide. A modest separation of LASH material into
sorbent-rich and ash-rich materials (suitable for recycle and disposal,
respectively) in the context of SSRP process could be achieved with
gravity-assisted separation technique. The sorbent-rich fraction had about
65% weight of the LASH material and contained 45% of the ash as well as 80%
of the sorbent in the LASH. It should be noted that in order to achieve even
such a modest level of separation, one has to deal with two separate streams
in the context of SSRP process. While the sorbent-rich stream is hydrolyzed
and recycled, the ash-rich stream should also be hydrolyzed separately to
produce suitable material for landfill disposal.