FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT
September 1, 1996, through February
28, 1998
Project Title: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF A COPPER OXIDE DESULFURIZATION
AND NOx REMOVAL SYSTEM
ICCI Project Number: 96-1/2.1A-5
Principal Investigator: David G. Sloat, Sargent & Lundy
Other Investigators: Jeri C. Penrose, Sargent & Lundy; Joseph N. Darguzas, Sargent & Lundy; Raj Gaikwad, Sargent & Lundy
Project Manager: Ronald H. Carty,
ICCI
ABSTRACT
This work supports continued development of the Copper Oxide process for controlling emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from coal combustion. This advanced process utilizes a moving bed of regenerable sorbent to capture sulfur oxides from hot flue gas and recover the collected sulfur as a saleable by-product such as fertilizer, elemental sulfur, or sulfuric acid instead of producing large quantities of solid waste requiring disposal. At the same time, the sorbent catalytically reduces nitrogen oxides. Previous pilot studies have confirmed the process is capable of high removal efficiencies for both pollutants while firing high-sulfur Illinois coal; and previous economic studies have shown the process is an attractive alternative to conventional flue gas desulfurization technologies.
The current project builds on the successful pilot testing performed to date
to advance the technical and economic basis for furthering commercialization of
the process. This project includes:
In general, this work addresses technical issues peripheral to the main process which has been the focus of development efforts to date. These issues are important to eventual commercial acceptance of the process, and concurrent work in these areas in parallel with ongoing process development and scale-up through the U.S. Department of Energy LEBS program will hasten commercialization of the technology.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Copper Oxide process promises to be an economical and attractive flue
gas desulfurization process for Illinois coals with medium to high sulfur
content. The process uses a regenerable sorbent in a moving bed to
simultaneously capture sulfur dioxide and catalytically reduce nitrogen oxides
in flue gas. Regeneration of the sorbent then releases the sulfur dioxide in a
concentrated stream for recovery. The sulfur dioxide is recovered as a
byproduct such as fertilizer, elemental sulfur, or sulfuric acid for sale
rather than generating large quantities of waste products as with some other
FGD options.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center (PETC)
has performed pilot scale parametric testing of the process which showed sulfur
dioxide removals greater than 93% when firing a 2.6% sulfur Illinois coal. Over
90% NOx removal was also realized. These results validated the
process model and provided a basis for continued process development.
These results were confirmed by a pilot testing program at the Illinois Coal
Development Park (ICDP) test facilities. In this program, a medium-scale Copper
Oxide pilot plant was constructed and operated and which achieved SO2
removals of 98% and NOx removals approaching 100% with no ammonia
slip. This pilot plant is an order of magnitude larger than the pilot plant at
PETC and is one-tenth the size anticipated for commercial adsorber modules.
Economic analysis indicated the process is competitive with other FGD
technologies, particularly when NOx removal is required.
The purpose of this study is to continue the development of the Copper Oxide process for controlling SO2 and NOx emissions from coal combustion. This work is focused on three areas important for commercial acceptance:
Potential catalytic formation of dioxin in the process
Removal efficiency of the trace amounts of SO3 in the flue gas
Options for production of salable byproducts from recovered SO2
Assessment of the Potential for Dioxin Formation
Low temperature formation of dioxins in municipal waste combustion facilities has been found to be promoted by copper-catalyzed reactions, so the use of copper in the Copper Oxide flue gas cleanup process has been brought into question. The Copper Oxide process relies on contacting flue gas with a copper and copper oxide based sorbent to capture SO2 from the gas. This has raised suspicions that concurrent reactions similar to those in municipal waste combustors might promote dioxin formation as an unintended side reaction in the Copper Oxide process.
Published literature suggests that use of copper sorbents for
desulfurization in the Copper Oxide process are not likely to cause increased
polychlorinated dibenzodioxin (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF)
formation in treated flue gas. High amounts of SO2 in Copper Oxide
process applications appear to provide protection against copper-catalyzed PCDD
and PCDF reactions. In addition, the g-alumina
supported copper oxide sorbent has been found to capture HCl instead of
promoting Cl2 formation, again protecting against PCDD and PCDF
formation. Confirmation of these indications by direct measurement at the
planned scale-up to a single commercial module test facility treating a
slipstream of flue gas from coal-firing at a commercial site should be carried out.
Characterization of SO3 Removal Performance
The Copper Oxide process was found to provide high removals of SO3
and reduce levels in treated flue gas to below 2 ppm. For flue gas from typical
boilers combusting high-sulfur coals, this would reduce acid dew points by
about 50o F. The additional heat recovery made available would
improve boiler thermal efficiencies by 1.4 percentage points, with cost savings
of about 15 to 20 cents per MWh. Alternatively, lower acid dew points would
minimize corrosion from acid condensation in downstream ductwork. This
collateral advantage provides additional commercial justification for use of
the Copper Oxide process to treat flue gases from combustion of Illinois coals.
Evaluation of Byproduct Options
In order to be an economically viable flue gas cleanup process, the Copper
Oxide technology must include byproduct production technology to convert SO2
removed from the flue gas to a saleable byproduct. There are three primary
byproduct options: sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur, and ammonium sulfate
fertilizer.
Sulfuric acid and elemental sulfur can be produced by applying existing
commercially available technology. Sulfuric acid will be an attractive option
for large facilities only, because the chemical plant involved is capital
intensive. Elemental sulfur can be economically produced at a wider range of
plant sizes, but the market price has been depressed by high levels of
byproduct production in natural gas fields for a decade and the economics of
this byproduct are strongly influenced by proximity to customers.
Ammonium sulfate is an attractive third alternative, particularly with the high
value of this material when manufactured in the most desirable grade. It will
be especially appealing to smaller installations which cannot afford a sulfuric
acid plant or which are not situated to compete in the elemental sulfur market.
While ammonium sulfate has been produced both as a byproduct as well as from
virgin raw materials for a century, a complete process utilizing the SO2-rich
offgas as a feedstock is not commercially available. Therefore, continued
development of a process for producing ammonium sulfate fertilizer based on
processing to produce concentrated ammonium sulfate solution in combination
with commercially available crystallization technology is needed to enhance
commercialization prospects.