INTERIM FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT

November 1, 1999, through October 31, 2000

 

Project Title:        RAPID-SETTING CEMENT MANUFACTURE USING FGD SLUDGE

ICCI Project Number:     99-1/2.1C-1

Principal Investigator:       Sankar Bhattacharja, Construction Technology Laboratories (CTL), Inc.

Other Investigators:          F. M. Miller, F. J. Tang, CTL, Inc.

Project Manager:             Ronald H. Carty, ICCI

 

ABSTRACT

Approximately 22 million metric tons of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) sludge is produced in the U.S., only 7.5% of which is used for beneficial purposes.  Sludge that has been converted to sulfate through forced oxidation has been utilized to make wallboard and portland cement.  The presence of high levels of sulfate and sulfite, along with other constituents, limits the appeal of these residues for other direct utilization scenarios.  However, FGD residues, can be utilized in manufacturing a rapid-setting cement based on calcium sulfoaluminate. This cement type requires raw ingredients high in sulfur content; FGD residues can provide all the sulfur necessary.  Presently, commercial rapid-setting cements are made with relatively pure materials and have a reasonable market demand.  This cement is widely used as rapid-setting and shrinkage-compensating cement, including highway pavement, and the demand is rapidly increasing as certain durability-related concerns are being addressed.

Two FGD sludges, one predominantly sulfate and the other sulfite, were investigated in the 1998-1999 project period.  The performance of Type I portland cement made with the sulfate sludge clearly indicates that sulfate sludge is a good source of gypsum in the manufacture of portland cement.

Sulfite sludge, not suitable for making portland cement, was used to produce rapid-setting cement in a pilot-scale rotary kiln system utilizing 13% sulfite sludge, based on dry weight.  The clinkering temperature was approximately 200°C lower than that required to manufacture portland cement clinker. Also, substantial energy can be saved in the grinding process due to the softer rapid-setting clinker.  A one-to-one comparison with a commercial rapid-setting cement clearly indicates that sulfite-derived rapid-setting cement has superior flow properties and comparable compressive strength development.

The objective of the present project is to transfer the technology from the pilot-scale production, performed last year, to a commercial cement manufacturing plant.  Due to high demand of cement in the expanding construction industry, the agreement with the cement plant did not materialize and difficulties were encountered in striving to accomplish this year’s objective.    However, a verbal agreement with a cement plant for test burn has been reached, and an arrangement for drying the wet FGD sludge is currently being concluded.

Pages 1-9 contain proprietary information.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The ultimate goal of this project is to utilize the FGD sludge, predominantly a hydrate of calcium sulfite and produced in power plants that burn Illinois coal, to manufacture rapid-setting cement.  Annually, approximately 22 million metric tons of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) sludge is produced in the U.S., of which only 7.5% is used for beneficial purposes.  (FGD sludge that has been converted to calcium sulfate through forced oxidation finds some use in making wallboard or portland cement as synthetic gypsum, provided it is relatively pure).  As a result, the majority of the FGD residues are not very appealing for other direct utilization purposes.  The problems of disposal of this sludge are expected to escalate further in the future unless viable utilization technologies are developed and implemented.  Illinois produces about 1 million tons of FGD sludge per year.  Because of the relatively high sulfur content of Illinois coal, utilization of sludge for commercial purposes is important to encourage continued use of Illinois coal by power plants.

A rapid-setting cement, also known as calcium sulfoaluminate cement, is substantially different from ordinary portland cement (OPC) in its setting behavior and strength development profile. As the raw materials requirements and the phase composition of these cements are different from those required for making OPC, they fall under the category of special cements.  This cement requires raw ingredients high in sulfur, while OPC normally has a maximum of 3.5% sulfate as SO3.  Also, production of these cements can be carried out at processing temperatures that are approximately 200°C lower than those necessary for OPC.  Because of lower firing temperature, the pyroprocessed product is softer and substantial energy can be saved in the grinding process.  Commercially, this cement is made from relatively pure raw ingredients and, as a specialty cement, has a significant market demand.  Currently, rapid-setting cement is not produced in Illinois.

These cements are used in many high volume applications such as bridge decks, airport runways, patching roadways, sidewalks, etc. where rapid strength development is necessary.  In addition, they may be modified for use in shrinkage compensation concrete by mixing with portland cement and for controlled low-strength materials (CLSM) used for diggable back-filling of utility trenches.  A 1996 survey indicates that 81,000 metric tons of rapid-setting cement was produced in the U.S.  In recent years, the use of rapid-setting cements has increased substantially, as more and more technical data are generated in regards to their performance and durability.

The goal is to exploit the compositional make-up of these residues (which makes them otherwise unattractive) to produce rapid-setting cement.  Of the following two steps necessary to accomplish the objective of this project, Step I was accomplished in the 1998-1999 project period.

Step I:     Composition formulation, process development, characterization of products, and optimization of composition to meet the primary requirements for commercial rapid-setting cements.

Step II:    Upon successful completion of Step I, "scale-up" from pilot-scale investigation to demonstration phase where rapid-setting cement will be produced in a commercial cement manufacturing plant located in Illinois.

In the 1998-1999 project period two FGD sludges were investigated; one was predominantly a hydrate of calcium sulfate and the other was a hydrate of calcium sulfite.  Realizing that sulfate sludge is a good candidate for manufacturing of portland cement, portland cement clinker was interground with sulfate sludge and the performance of the resultant cement was compared to that of a cement produced with natural gypsum.  The performance of Type I portland cement produced with sulfate sludge was equal to or superior to that of cements made with standard gypsum.  This result clearly indicates that sulfate sludge is a suitable source of gypsum used in the manufacture of portland cement.

Manufacture of rapid-setting cement utilizing sulfite sludge, not suitable to make portland cement, however, was the major focus of last year’s project.  Upon successful preparation of several rapid-setting cements in the laboratory-scale with sulfite sludge, the parameters necessary for the pilot-scale production were established.  Based upon the information developed in this bench-scale study, rapid setting cement was produced in a pilot-scale rotary kiln utilizing 13% sulfite sludge, based upon dry mass of the total raw ingredients.  The clinkering temperature was about 200°C lower than that typically required to produce portland cement clinker.  The results of a one-on-one comparison with commercial rapid-setting cement indicated that for comparable flow, the strength development and time of setting of these two cements were comparable.

Based upon the accomplishments made in the pilot-scale program, the present phase requiring plant-scale demonstration was initiated.  The objective was to accomplish this goal within the framework of seven tasks that include procurement of raw ingredients to composition formulation to plant-scale production and characterization of the products made.

However, significant difficulties have been encountered in the availability of a cement plant to conduct the work proposed in the present phase.  Because of high demand for cement in the construction industry, the agreement initially received in regards to the availability of a cement plant did not materialize.  Since then, several options have been considered and a number of cement plants have been actively pursued to become the site for technology demonstration.  Significant progress has been made in such discussion with a cement plant and an agreement has been reached on the use of this plant to produce rapid-setting cement.  Since the FGD sludge is wet and requires drying before shipment and mixing with other raw ingredients, several drying options have been considered.  Presently, a drying arrangement near the power plant is being actively pursued, and it is expected to be finalized in the month of November.

 

 

The remainder of this report contains proprietary information and is not available for distribution except to the sponsor(s) of this project.